Hey guys, I thought I'd just answer some legal questions for the haters because they're still rambling on on their fake profiles and their fake websites and their fake groups.
They said that I've been arrested and that's why I'm not rambling so much.
I am being arrested because I'm broken any laws, you know, because telling the truth isn't breaking the law.
However, producing malicious groups and comments is.
And I am being ranted because I've had a bad tough and I'm being able to.
However, I have had one antibiotic and two hours good sleep, maybe four now, and I feel a lot better and I've just taken my second antibiotic.
So amoxicillin I'm on, so brilliant.
Right, so there's a few people ranting and raving because they don't like my videos.
You have a right to defend myself, which I will.
So if you produce anything off a public domain like Facebook or Twitter or anything like that or TikTok and you repost it, it's in the public domain.
You own the copyright by law, which is civil, but it's in the public domain and that means it's a civil dispute if you want to take somebody to court to sue them for using your copyright.
However, if you take that information and you twist it and turn it into something malicious, which isn't true, then that comes under the Malicious Communications Act and therefore you can be charged for that and the police will pursue that criminally.
Okay, and then what I've learned is that once you get a criminal conviction, you will probably get some sort of compensation, minimal as pennies and if of victims.
But then once you've got the criminal conviction, you've got more clout to take it to a civil court and get more because you've got the criminal conviction.
So you're not arguing whether the person is wrong or right.
You're arguing with the amount of damage that they've done to you or your business or your own life or whatever, aren't you?
But you've got the proof there because they've been proved guilty or they've owned up to it.
So I just thought I would produce this so that people are aware that if you're posting pictures on Facebook that you don't want to be shared, then you need to change them to private or think about not putting them on.
Okay, so in the UK content posted on social media without privacy restrictions is generally considered in the public domain and accessible to the public, including journalists.
That's how some journalists can write stories about you.
I had a story written about me, and it was a nice story, but I didn't give permission for it.
The first newspaper story that was ever written about us, and I had to tell them, I had to contact them and say you're factually incorrect.
And you know what, they never even go back to me and said, Oh, we're really sorry, we'll change it now.
They just change the factually incorrect bits.
You know, there's no honour among thieves.
There's no honour among journalists.
To view and potentially publish.
However, users retain copyright and ownership and platforms receive licences to host.
Publicly accessible doesn't mean free of IP rights.
So you still own the copyright, but obviously that could be civil, unless it's being used maliciously.
Okay.
Unless you're trademarked.
Why do you think we trademarked?
Here is a breakdown on the key aspects regarding social media and public domain in the UK.
So you can pause this and look at yourself or you can look it up yourself as well.
You're entitled to what constitutes public domain on social media.
Default public status.
If posts, photos and information are not protected by privacy settings, then they're in the public domain.
So anybody can recreate it, use it as long as they're not using it maliciously.
Easy access information is generally considered in the public domain if it's easy and readily available to the public via a simple search.
Unstoppable public view for some elements like profile pictures on Facebook and ex Twitter.
They're so annoying they change that away.
I had to change all my posters.
Cannot be hidden by privacy settings and are always public.
Privacy settings matter.
Content beyond privacy settings visible only to friends and followers is not truly in the public domain.
And then intellectual property copyright is unless you've bought the copyright and you have a trademark, then it is civil.
If you have a trademark and you somebody else's you use something which is trademarked which they have, including our name.
So when you're using our name all over Facebook, you are in breach of trademark and breach of trademark law is actually criminal.
And that's why the police pursue it for us, because it's criminal.
And I didn't know that when I signed up, I just assumed it was going to be civil.
And it was something that I learned when the the pedo was driving around with my sign that he'd stolen in his van.
And I believe trading standards from Caerphilly Council went out and told him he is not to drive around with that in there, or they were booking because it is under trademark law.
So trading, I think trading standards have the power to book you, don't they?
I think they do.
Anyway, they have a lot of power, don't they?
Trading standards and environmental law can go into your business like this time of night when it's shut, can't they?
Without a warrant, I think they get automatic access.
So they could just arrest somebody or they could issue paperwork, I think, and the police enforce it.
I don't know how that works.
You'd have to check that up.
I'm not going to do a video on how the council work with their trademark law and how they do things like that.
So there we are, guys.
If you want to stop and look, you can.
But I had a story written about me once by a journalist.
And although it was a decent story, I didn't want it done at the time.
And they wrote stuff that was factually incorrect.
And when I told them it was factually incorrect, they just changed it and didn't even acknowledge anything, you know.
And then I think the second and the third ones, they were actually done with our permission, you know, and they came looking for us to do stories about us.
So that's fine.
And they were lovely stories.
So I just, I post that.
I feel a lot better now.
I've had some antibiotics.
It is bad.
And I'm going to have the tooth out because it's already got a root canal.
And every root canal I've ever had a couple of years down the line have failed.
And they want to take out the root canal.
And then they want to put in a new one.
And that's £800.
And it's only going to last three to five years and become infected again.
To do a root canal, it's got to be really straight.
And it's not it's like twisted at the bottom.
My teeth are.
They showed me once when they pulled one out.
So I'm just going to have the tooth out and be done with it because I'm being in a lot of pain.
And like I said, I don't sleep a lot.
But when I do need my couple of hours or my nap, I need it like, you know, and it doesn't help at all.
So just to confirm I am being arrested.
I find it quite far out quite funny how Twat Warner is saying that she spent three hours with a solicitor or police officer in her house.
What police officer do you know spent three hours in your house taking a statement?
They're usually in and out and tell you to come and sign it once they've done it.
I don't know anything about that.
Do you?
Three hours and she had a solicitor there?
Do you believe that?
Or do you believe that perhaps she was taken in by voluntary or arrested?
And then she had a duty solicitor sounds like to me.
So there we are.
There we are, guys.
And don't forget, it's only slander, it's only defamation if it's not true.
You know, so if I say you're a Twat on Facebook and you're being a Twat, what are you going to say?
What are you going to say?
If I say you're being malicious on Facebook, what are you going to do if you are being malicious?
Because it's the truth.
You can't get arrested for the truth.
And contrary to popular belief, you can't get arrested for recycling, either.
And giving all the money back to the public.